Concurrent Employment: The Statute Means What It Says
The statute means just what it says. Supreme Court rejects Court of Appeals' reasoning on concurrent employment.
On August 20, 2015, the Kentucky Supreme Court issued its published decision in Garrard Co. Fiscal Court v. Camps, 2014-SC-000610-WC, a case dealing with contemporaneous employment and average weekly wage for worker's compensation purposes. Why is this important? Two reasons. First, the Supreme Court went all Hulkamania on Justices Stumbo and Taylor from the Court of Appeals. And it has a big impact on how we calculate benefits in Kentucky workers' compensation.
